Seven species listed under the Species at Risk Act call Jasper National Park home.
There is, of course, the much talked about Woodland caribou. But there is also the olive-sided flycatcher, the common nighthawk, Haller鈥檚 apple moss, whitebark pine and two species of bats鈥攖he little brown myotis and the northern myotis.
Currently, three of those four species are considered endangered: whitebark pine, as well as the two bat species, while the remaining four are listed as threatened.
A threatened species is defined as being on its way to becoming endangered, while an endangered species is on its way to becoming extinct.
To ensure the longevity of these species and to fulfill its obligations under the Species at Risk Act, Parks Canada is currently working on a multi-species action plan that will steer the agency鈥檚 future recovery efforts.
鈥淲e have seven species at risk in Jasper National Park and we鈥檙e bundling all those seven species at risk into one multi-species action plan,鈥� explained Salman Rasheed, resource conservation manager for JNP. 鈥淲e just think it鈥檚 a far more efficient way to go, as opposed to having seven separate action plans. Some of our actions will affect one or two or three of the species, whereas some of our actions will affect one or two.鈥�
Rasheed presented some of Parks鈥� proposed recovery actions at the annual Jasper Park Forum, March 16, and explained to the packed house that as part of the process of creating an action plan,
Parks is required to consult with the public鈥攁nd that consultation period is now open.
鈥淧art of the action planning process is trying to cooperate and consult with both stakeholders and the public, our indigenous partners and any other interested parties, whether it鈥檚 provincial jurisdictions or other federal jurisdictions. That public consultation process is ongoing right now,鈥� he said, noting that sometime this spring a draft action plan will be released to the public on the Species at Risk Public Registry for further review.
鈥淎s part of that formal consultation, we are compelled by the act鈥攖he act is incredibly prescriptive鈥攖o post the action plan on the species at risk registry, an Internet site where all national parks, all jurisdictions, have to post these action plans and recovery strategies,鈥� he said.
Once the draft is posted, there will be a 60-day public consultation period before the plan is amended and finalized.
鈥淭he intent of this consultation is to make sure we get it right,鈥� said Rasheed.
In JNP, Woodland caribou garner the most attention out of all of the park鈥檚 species at risk.
There are currently 31 caribou remaining in the Tonquin herd, 10 in the Brazeau and three in the Maligne.
According to Parks鈥� annual report for 2015, the Tonquin herd is considered large enough to be self-sustaining, but ongoing conservation efforts are necessary to support the herd鈥檚 recovery.
The other two herds, however, are considered critically small and could benefit from herd augmentation鈥攚hich is one of the proposed recovery actions in the draft action plan.
To help with that augmentation, Parks had planned to work with the Calgary Zoo and the Government of British Columbia on a captive breeding program, but the zoo pulled its support in 2014, citing funding as the primary reason for its decision.
Since then, little has been said about the breeding program.
鈥淲e鈥檙e still looking at what our options are and how we鈥檙e going to proceed with it,鈥� said Shelley Bird of the Mountain National Parks Caribou Conservation Program. 鈥淲e don鈥檛 have any timelines. We don鈥檛 have any more information.鈥�
As well as investigating options for augmentation, another proposed recovery action is to manage seasonal access to critical caribou habitat. That is an action that is already being undertaken in JNP, with delayed winter access in numerous areas of the park, preventing skiers from creating packed trails that make it easier for wolves to access caribou in the alpine.
鈥淎s far as the action plan goes, our caribou actions are basically what we鈥檝e already been working towards,鈥� said Bird. 鈥淲e鈥檝e identified what the threats are and we鈥檙e working towards addressing those.鈥�
During the forum, Rasheed stressed that recovering an endangered or threatened species doesn鈥檛 happen overnight; it can take decades.
As an example, he pointed to the recovery actions in place for whitebark pine鈥攐ne of the park鈥檚 endangered species.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a species that鈥檚 threatened by invasive fungus called blister rust and blister rust basically kills the tree, so that鈥檚 a significant threat to the species,鈥� he explained.
But, amongst infected trees, Parks has noticed there are some trees that appear to be resistant to blister rust.
鈥淲e sometimes think of these trees as super trees,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey have something about them that imparts a particular kind of resistance, so we identify those trees and ... climb up the tree and cover the cones with a metal cage.鈥�
The cage protects the cones, allowing them to mature without being eaten by a Clark鈥檚 nutcracker, so at the end of the season, they can be harvested. Then the seeds from the 鈥渟uper trees鈥� are sent off to a breeding facility and grown into seedlings.
鈥淓ventually we鈥檒l take those seedlings and our plan is to plant them back on the landscape in Jasper where there鈥檚 been heavy rates of infestation from blister rust.
鈥淣ow, you can imagine these trees are incredibly slow growing鈥攚e have identified individuals in the park that are upwards of 300 years old鈥攕o I think I and many of the folks in this room will be long gone before we can assess the success of this restoration effort.鈥�
To provide Parks with feedback on its draft action plan before it is released on the public registry, contact Bird at [email protected] or Conservation Biologist Brenda Shepherd at [email protected].
For more information on species at risk in JNP, visit the Species at Risk Act Registry at www.sararegistry.gc.ca.
Nicole Veerman
[email protected]
